2026-04-18 23:42:20 +08:00

5.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

name	description
market-academic-insight	Generate structured market research and academic insight briefs with clear evidence, trends, risks, and opportunities. Use when the user asks for industry research, market trends, literature review, academic progress tracking, or evidence-based insight synthesis. 中文触发词包括：行业洞察、市场研究、学术综述、论文进展、趋势分析、研究简报。

Market & Academic Insight

Overview

This skill produces structured research briefs for two closely related scenarios:

Market insight - industry trends, company landscape, competitor movement, regional opportunity, policy impact
Academic insight - literature scan, research progress summary, topic synthesis, evidence comparison, research gaps

Use this skill when the user needs research synthesis and judgment, not just raw search results.

Quick Start

When the user requests research or insight generation:

Identify whether the request is primarily market, academic, or hybrid
Clarify the topic, time range, geography, audience, and output depth
If live information is required, use existing search skills such as baidu-search
Synthesize findings into a structured brief with evidence separated from conclusions

中文任务映射

“做一份行业洞察” → market
“总结一下论文进展” → academic
“分析这个技术的产业机会” → hybrid
“整理成研究简报” → standard brief

Input Requirements

Collect the following information before producing the final brief:

Field	Required	Description
topic	yes	Research topic, industry, company, or academic theme
mode	yes	`market` / `academic` / `hybrid`
objective	yes	What decision or understanding this research should support
time range	no	Recent month, quarter, year, or custom range
geography	no	Country, region, or market scope
audience	no	Executive, product team, investor, researcher, student
output language	no	Language for the final brief
depth	no	Quick brief / standard report / deep dive

If information is missing, ask only for the fields that materially change the output.

Workflow Decision Tree

Market Insight Workflow

Use this path when the user asks about:

market trends
industry landscape
competitor movement
customer demand shifts
regulatory or policy effects
opportunity and risk assessment

Academic Insight Workflow

Use this path when the user asks about:

literature review
paper synthesis
research frontier
evidence comparison
methodology trends
open questions or research gaps

Hybrid Workflow

Use this path when the user wants both:

market adoption + academic progress
commercial relevance of a research area
industry impact of an emerging technology

Instructions

Step 1: Define scope

Restate the research target in a precise sentence:

what is being studied
why it matters
what decision it should support

Step 2: Gather evidence

Prefer recent, attributable sources. If live retrieval is needed, use baidu-search or other enabled search tools.

For each key source, capture:

source name
date
relevant claim or data point
confidence or limitation

Step 3: Separate facts from interpretation

Always distinguish:

Evidence: reported facts, data, quotes, findings
Analysis: what those facts imply
Speculation: what may happen next

Never present an assumption as a confirmed fact.

Step 4: Synthesize by theme

Group findings into 3-6 themes such as:

growth drivers
demand shifts
technology maturity
methodological differences
adoption barriers
competitive positioning

Step 5: Produce conclusions

End with concise insight statements that answer the user’s objective, not just summarize materials.

Output Format

Use the following structure by default:

# [Title]

## Executive Summary
[3-6 sentence summary]

## Research Scope
- Topic:
- Mode:
- Time range:
- Geography:
- Audience:

## Key Findings
### 1. [Theme]
- Evidence:
- Interpretation:
- Implication:

### 2. [Theme]
- Evidence:
- Interpretation:
- Implication:

## Risks and Uncertainties
- [Risk / limitation]

## Opportunities or Next Steps
- [Actionable recommendation]

## Evidence Log
- [Source] - [Date] - [Key point]

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

conclusions directly answer the user’s goal
evidence and judgment are clearly separated
time range and geography are explicit when relevant
contradictory evidence is acknowledged
outdated or weak evidence is labeled as such
no fabricated citations or unverified claims are included

Fallback Strategy

If evidence is limited:

say what is known
say what remains uncertain
suggest what additional sources or validation would improve confidence

Do not invent detail to make the brief look complete.

skills/baidu-search/SKILL.md - retrieve current external information
skills/auto-daily-summary/SKILL.md - condense a large evidence set into a recurring summary
skills/competitor-news-intel/SKILL.md - competitor-focused monitoring and intelligence

Examples

User: "帮我做一份中国 AI Agent 市场趋势洞察"

Output should include:

market scope and timeframe
major players and movement
demand signals
risks and opportunities
evidence log

User: "总结一下多模态检索近一年的学术进展"