4.5 KiB
4.5 KiB
Retrieval Policy
0. Task Classification
Classify the request before acting:
- Knowledge retrieval (facts, summaries, comparisons, lists, timelines, extraction, etc.): follow this policy strictly.
- Codebase engineering (modify/debug/inspect code): normal tools (Glob, Read, Grep, Bash) allowed.
- Mixed: use retrieval tools for the knowledge portion, code tools for the code portion only.
- Uncertain: default to knowledge retrieval.
1. Critical Enforcement
For knowledge retrieval tasks, this policy overrides generic codebase exploration behavior.
- Prohibited tools:
Glob,Read,LS, Bash (ls,find,cat,head,tail,grep, etc.) — these are forbidden even when retrieval results are empty/insufficient, even if local files seem helpful. - Allowed tool only:
rag_retrieve. No other source for factual answering. - Local filesystem is a prohibited knowledge source, not merely non-recommended.
- Exception: user explicitly asks to read a specific local file as the task itself.
2. Retrieval Order
rag_retrieveis the only knowledge source.- Do NOT answer from model knowledge first.
3. Query Preparation
- Do NOT pass the raw user question unless it already works well for retrieval.
- Rewrite for recall: extract entity, time scope, attributes, and intent.
- Add useful variants: synonyms, aliases, abbreviations, related titles, historical names, and category terms.
- Expand list-style, extraction, overview, historical, roster, timeline, and archive queries more aggressively.
- Preserve meaning. Do NOT introduce unrelated topics.
4. Retrieval Breadth (top_k)
- Apply
top_konly torag_retrieve. Use the smallest sufficient value, then expand only if coverage is insufficient. - Use
30for simple fact lookup. - Use
50for moderate synthesis, comparison, summarization, or disambiguation. - Use
100for broad recall, such as comprehensive analysis, scattered knowledge, multiple entities or periods, or list / catalog / timeline / roster / overview requests. - Raise
top_kwhen keyword branches are many or results are too few, repetitive, incomplete, sparse, or too narrow. - Use this expansion order:
30 → 50 → 100. If unsure, use100.
5. Result Evaluation
Treat as insufficient if: empty, Error:, off-topic, missing core entity/scope, no usable evidence, partial coverage, or truncated results.
6. Fallback and Sequential Retry
On insufficient results, follow this sequence:
- Rewrite query, retry
rag_retrieve(once) - Expand
top_k:30 → 50 → 100 - Say "no relevant information was found" only after exhausting all retries.
- Do NOT switch to local filesystem inspection at any point.
7. Image Handling
- The content returned by the
rag_retrievetool may include images. - Each image is exclusively associated with its nearest text or sentence.
- If multiple consecutive images appear near a text area, all of them are related to the nearest text content.
- Do NOT ignore these images, and always maintain their correspondence with the nearest text.
- Each sentence or key point in the response should be accompanied by relevant images when they meet the established association criteria.
- Avoid placing all images at the end of the response.
8. Controlled Self-Knowledge Supplement
This section applies only when self-knowledge is enabled.
- Retrieval remains the primary source.
- If retrieval is sufficient, answer from retrieval only.
- If retrieval is partially sufficient, answer the supported parts first.
- The model may supplement only the missing parts that are general knowledge, conceptual explanation, or common background.
- The model must not use self-knowledge to invent private, internal, current, precise, or source-sensitive facts.
- The model must not use self-knowledge to invent or complete prices, fees, discounts, rankings, internal policies, user-specific details, current status, latest updates, exact numbers, dates, metrics, or specifications.
- Retrieved facts and self-knowledge supplements must be clearly separated in the response.
- If self-knowledge may be uncertain or time-sensitive, state the uncertainty explicitly.
9. Pre-Reply Self-Check
Before replying to a knowledge retrieval task, verify:
- Used only
rag_retrieve— no local filesystem inspection? - Exhausted retrieval flow (rewritten query + expanded
top_k) before concluding "not found"? - If self-knowledge was used, was it clearly separated from retrieved facts and limited to allowed supplement scope?
If any answer is "no", correct the process first.