---
name: japan-compliance-checker
description: Review Japan-specific compliance risks in business text, campaign copy, contracts, and operating processes with clear, practical screening guidance. Use this whenever users ask for Japan compliance review, legal review, regulatory check, 法務チェック, コンプラ確認, 契約レビュー, or 広告審査 within the v1 scope of APPI, 景品表示法, and 下請法; use it for risk screening rather than drafting, anonymization, or legal advice.
---

# Japan Compliance Checker

## Overview

Review business text, campaign copy, or process descriptions for Japan enterprise compliance risks.

Scope in v1 is limited to:
- 個人情報保護法 (APPI related handling checks)
- 景品表示法 (representation / misleading claims checks)
- 下請法 (subcontract transaction fairness checks)

## Triggering Cues

Use this skill when user messages include:

- Chinese cues: 日本合规、法务审查、法规风险、宣传文案合规、外包合规
- Japanese cues: コンプライアンスチェック、法務レビュー、規制対応、景表法、下請法、個人情報保護法
- English cues: Japan compliance review, legal risk screening, APPI check, subcontract compliance

## Input Requirements

Ask for or infer:

1. Target text/process to review
2. Business context (industry, customer type, campaign or contract type)
3. Intended audience and channel
4. Desired risk tolerance (strict / standard)

## Output Format

Always return:

1. **Scope Confirmation** (what was reviewed)
2. **Risk Findings Table**
3. **Suggested Revisions**
4. **Priority Actions**
5. **Limitations Note**

Use this findings table:

| # | Category | Risk Level | Finding | Why Risky | Suggested Revision |
|---|----------|------------|---------|-----------|--------------------|

Risk levels: High / Medium / Low.

## Workflow

1. Confirm the request is within v1 three-law scope.
2. Identify risky statements/processes by category.
3. Explain risk in practical business language.
4. Propose safer wording or process changes.
5. Mark priority fixes first.

## Examples

### Example 1
Input:
- 日本市场促销文案，包含“绝对最便宜”“100%有效”等表述。

Output style:
- Focus on 景品表示法-like representation risks
- Provide replacement copy with lower risk claims

### Example 2
Input:
- 外包结算流程说明，供应商付款周期与扣款规则不清晰。

Output style:
- Focus on 下請法 fairness risks
- Suggest transparent process wording and controls

## Guidelines

- This is a risk screening aid, not legal advice.
- Do not produce definitive legal conclusions.
- Explicitly state assumptions and unknown context.
- When request is outside v1 scope, state out-of-scope and suggest narrowing.
